If the 3rd person is as good as ME series fx, I will probably have a playthrough with it, probably like a Nord Warrior. So to sum up: TES is, for me, a first person game, and I will use it primarily. And I think that has, for me atleast, a lot to do with the feeling of seeing everything in 1st person, as if I were experiencing it myself. In those 3rd person games, it doesn't feel as authentic as TES-games does. It's just a transition from one stationary position to another - looks bad rly.ĭepending on how realistic it will feel, but I'm 90% sure I will run around in 1st person, since it also makes me feel more in-character, as opposed to a game like Mass Effect 3 or Assassins Creed. It felt like the player was floating around (especially late game with 100 in all stats such as acrobatics, speed etc.), and when you jump, you don't leap or anything. Oblivion: Played in 1st person, and the 3rd person camera and movement looked retarded tbh. Playing from the third-person, you can more easily protect your character with viewpoints covering all areas and camera angles that allow for much better situational awareness (or the ability to peek around corners without the associated risk of exposing oneself, if were being brutally honest).

3rd person was too hilarious (the way NPC's walked, like they shat their pants) to play. For The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim on the Xbox 360, a GameFAQs message board topic titled '10 reasons Skyrims combat is better then other RPG with 3rd person combat.' - . Third-person ranged combat has improved with unprecedented realism in recent times.

Skyrim better 3rd person combat